Jump to content

Mongo

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mongo

  1. I read a fascinating article in Racecar Engineering magazine.  The article broke down all the major formulas for suspension and steering geometry into easy step by step instructions with descriptive examples.  This was a simple process that did not require CAD.  It only needed a scientific calculator. 

    Is there any resource that can walk me through the basic math and physics regarding structures that consist of layers of bidirectional weave composites, core materials and the resins?

     

  2. Perhaps there are two words to consider in this CF application?  Galvanic Corrosion.  

    Are you using any alloys in this application, because galvanic corrosion might become an issue in water.

  3.   

    4 hours ago, lo_0l said:

    Hey @Mongo!

    I don't think so. From what I've seen modeling have gotten so darn good they rarely use full scale models. Though they do eventually test full-scale models to verify things.

    I'm not sure that I'd use chipboard, but there are most definitely some materials you could take advantage of. I think the problem with composites for mainstream vehicles is cost/consistency right now. You're starting to see it more and more as they work out the kinks though!

    Were you thinking of doing a full composite chassis or just partial?

    My plan is for the chassis to be composite and the suspension/control arms to be alloy.  I was thinking of making a 1:10 scale model in a cheap material.

     

  4. Everything seems to be on the computer these days.  I want to create a composite car chassis.  Does anybody make scale models to use for load tests when they are designing a chassis?  I want to put some chipboard (or other cheap material) in a laser cutter (or water jet) and build a scale model for testing its rigidity.  Would there be any advantage to testing a physical scale model over a virtual model in the computer?  Race teams still use a wind tunnel for scale models.  Do they use the models for any other load tests?

     

  5. I am hoping to find some load test data on CF panels joined with brackets.  I want to learn about CF panels being secured with angled brackets using adhesive, rivets, bolts, or a combination and see how they compare to single piece structures that came out of a mold.  My goal is to utilize an effective fabrication process to create a strong, but lightweight structure that uses minimal tooling.  No plugs, no molds, no need for vacuum bags, etc.  Just order flat panels that are cut on a CNC table and delivered to my door ready to be assembled.

     

  6. Welcome Jacky!  My name is Mongo and I am researching how to build a CF car chassis as well, so that makes us buddies!  😃  Everybody is super friendly and the staff from Rockwest frequents these forums.  They provide a wealth of information.

  7. What would it take for a hobbyist to design and construct a chassis for a road car (not race car) out of composites?  Note:  this chassis does not need to be crash tested.
    What percentage of labor is spent on the computer designing and verifying vs. actually constructing the chassis?  

  8. I need to create a seat for my car.  I want to form the seat to my body.  I have found videos demonstrating a couple of methods on YT. 

    The first is use expanding foam, from a hardware store, into a trash bag.  
    Pros   1.  Cheap   2.  Simple

    Cons  1.  Very exothermic reaction.  Could be uncomfortable.

               2.  Sets into shape way fast.  Not very workable before setting.

               3.  Cannot trial fit before pouring in foam.

               4.  Foam can shrink or distort when pulling a mold off of it.

     The second method is using foam beads and epoxy in a bag using a resin transfer method.

    Pros   1.  Can preform the seat shape with beads in the bag.

              2.  Takes time to set.  More opportunity to make minor adjustments

              3.   Epoxy retains dimensionality better than expanding foam.

    Cons  1.  Very exothermic reaction.  Could be pain.

               2.  Expensive

               3.  More complex.  Need vacuum pump and accessories normally associated with composite work.

    Which method do you feel will yield a better outcome?  I think the epoxy and foam beads method is the way to go.  But I have questions.

    How do I tackle the resin transfer process and prevent the foam beads from causing problems?  I don't want to draw a vacuum only to see my vacuum pot fill with thousands of beads.  I want complete saturation of the beads.
     

×
×
  • Create New...